陳思琪推出零（ZERO）代幣，聲稱拉地毯是一個錯誤
在推出零（ZERO）代幣後，陳思琪在 meme 代幣圈子中引發了另一個混亂時刻。然後他提出了一個賣單，聲稱這是一個錯誤，然後買回並燒燬了他的收入。
Runway 首席執行官、Serious Business 聯合創始人陳思琪再次在 Meme 代幣世界引發混亂。如果不是 Chen 的公開形象以及 MIRA 代幣最近的損失，地毯拉力和代幣歸零的現象不會被注意到。 MIRA 於 12 月 25 日推出，向 Chen 授予了部分代幣。由於屬於合法癌症研究慈善機構的炒作，該份額的名義價值短暫地從約 44 萬美元擴大到 600 萬美元。
Chen 推出了 ZERO，並警告稱這是一個會降至零的測試代幣。由於 Meme 代幣交易經常使用機器人，因此實際上存在買入訂單，立即注入 SOL 流動性並提高代幣的價值。 Chen 曾一度出售 ZERO，獲得 444 SOL，然後扭轉這一局面並證明他沒有收益。
所以我推出了一個名爲“零”的測試代幣，其描述是：“這將歸零……不要購買”，認爲人們會閱讀它而不是購買它。
我沒想到每個人都能看到它併購買它 - 我認爲這是我需要發推文的東西...... pic.twitter.com/bH4b0PIlJH
— 陳思琪 (@blader) 2024 年 12 月 30 日
On-chain researcher ZachXBT raised objections, showing that Chen also bought another token, ChAIrity, also placing a sell order that crashed the price. After the second token launch, however, Chen has stated he is ready to make some of the losing parties whole, despite the token warnings. Others warned Chen to avoid paying those that claim ZERO caused losses, as the token had a clear warning. No payments or compensation has been offered for MIRA traders, who managed to take much more significant profits.
The ZERO token still holds $141K in liquidity, and has not actually gone to zero. Since bots and irrational buyers are always active, the asset may see ongoing activity and not be abandoned. Until then, ZERO may continue to lead to losses, or put pressure on Chen to recover the damages.
MIRA continues to slide as a charity token
The older MIRA token continues to slide, showing that mixing charity and meme token trading has a big downside. MIRA pumped again to $0.026, then erased 50% of its value to $0.013. The token has only $814K in liquidity and has survived for several days.
Chen has warned he expects the token to go to zero, as he continued selling to take profits for his cancer research charity. At the same time, early buyers blamed him for not warning about potential losses. Whales were also easily taking profit, benefitting from the charity hype.
Initially, Chen said he did not mind the profit potential of MIRA, despite causing losses for the community. Some of the early wallets achieved profits of over $480K, essentially taking away funds that some buyers thought would go to charity. While MIRA was more efficient than the GoFundMe approach, it also led to great inefficiencies as traders sold their early positions.
MIRA gets boost from Binance Alpha
Despite whale selling, and despite warnings that Chen would liquidate his entire share of MIRA, the token may continue to trade. MIRA was added as one of the daily selections of Binance Alpha, allowing for fast purchases.
MIRA has already spread to 11,944 holders, and new whales have appeared. The token also sees activity from high-volume clusters. The clusters are unrelated to Chen’s known wallet.
As of December 31, part of the donation is still in Chen’s wallet, valued at around $1.1M after the recent price slide. MIRA can only be sold in small batches, due to its low liquidity. The token still lacks market-makers, and there is no long-term strategy for continuing its charity purpose.
With MIRA and ZERO, Chen may find himself involved with an unintended crypto community, who may continue to pump the token and demand exposure.
After the introduction of MIRA, the brief charity token trend subsided. The one asset that remained more active was ChAIrity, with only $50K in liquidity. The token pumped briefly, then lost more than 90% of its value as most of the holders were selling. Even those that wanted to donate to charity were reluctant to give up their funds to whales, instead of an actual charity.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
推薦文章
