Coinwire 報告：X 上 76% 的加密貨幣影響者推廣了 Memecoin，現已歸零
Coinwire 研究顯示，X 平臺上超過 76% 的影響者曾推廣過現已不復存在的模因幣。報告稱，只有 1% 的 memecoin 價值增加了 10 倍，其中 80% 在過去一週內下跌了 70% 以上。
Coinglass 分析了 377 名影響者推廣的 1500 多種模因幣的表現，每個影響者都有大約 1 萬名粉絲及以上，以得出“發人深省的事實”。報告稱，如果模因幣的價值自首次推出以來下降了 90%，則被認爲已死亡。
Twitter 影響者在加密詐騙中兜售死模因幣
付費 KOL：Twitter 影響者如何在您虧損的同時推廣死代幣和利潤
1/ 圍繞 memecoin 的炒作掩蓋了一個殘酷的現實：76% 的影響者宣傳死亡代幣，86% 的 memecoin 在短短 3 個月內損失了 90% 的價值。
讓我們深入研究一下數據。 🧵
2/它… pic.twitter.com/CCy6Tnc7pt
—酮 (@keto_studio) 2024 年 11 月 25 日
The Coinwire research used Dune Analytics data to gather information on 1,567 meme tokens. The study considered coins that X influencers had promoted over the past three months. The final results revealed that two out of three influencer-promoted memecoins were now worthless, as nearly 86% of them had lost over 90% of their value in three months.
Essentially, 80% of the promoted memecoins lost over 70% of their value in a week, 90% of them lost 80% in a month, and 86% of them experienced a 10x value drop in three months. The report showed that achieving 10x gains with influencer-backed memecoins was nearly impossible as only 1% of influencers promoted a memecoin that gained 10x. It also revealed that only 3% of memecoins promoted by influencers ever reached a 10x increase.
Coinwire research claimed that a large proportion of influencer-driven promotions were setting up crypto investors for failure. The report added that the influencers misled new investors who jumped into the projects without understanding the risks. The data indicated that most investors often lost significantly within weeks of investing, highlighting a pattern of volatility and instability of influencer-backed memecoins.
Research correlates influencer follower count to performance
According to the report, the larger the influencers following, the lower the performance of the memecoins they promoted. The report revealed that influencers with over 200K followers had the worst performance. The report highlighted that the meme coin promotions brought about 39% negative returns after a week and 89% negative returns after three months.
On the flip side, influencers with less than 50K followers had better outcomes, with 25% positive returns after a week. It also showed that their promotions eventually brought over 141% positive returns after three months.
The data suggested that smaller influencers had slightly more genuine promotion practices. It also concluded that larger influencers prioritized financial incentives over the quality of the projects they endorsed. The report showed that influencers earned an average of $399 per promotional tweet, with each post receiving over 15K views. Influencers notably benefited financially from promoting meme coins while investors often faced losses, highlighted the report.
The figures shared highlighted the incentive structure that drove influencers to promote even the ‘most questionable projects.’ For the influencers, the financial benefits were clear, while the consequences for the audiences were not. The researchers noted that the results could be far worse than reported since they were not able to crawl deleted promotional tweets. They added that numerous influencers had taken down most of the promotional tweets that had brought negative results for their followers.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
推薦文章
