陈思琪推出零（ZERO）代币，声称拉地毯是一个错误
在推出零（ZERO）代币后，陈思琪在 meme 代币圈子中引发了另一个混乱时刻。然后他提出了一个卖单，声称这是一个错误，然后买回并烧毁了他的收入。
Runway 首席执行官、Serious Business 联合创始人陈思琪再次在 Meme 代币世界引发混乱。如果不是 Chen 的公开形象以及 MIRA 代币最近的损失，地毯拉力和代币归零的现象不会被注意到。 MIRA 于 12 月 25 日推出，向 Chen 授予了部分代币。由于属于合法癌症研究慈善机构的炒作，该份额的名义价值短暂地从约 44 万美元扩大到 600 万美元。
Chen 推出了 ZERO，并警告称这是一个会降至零的测试代币。由于 Meme 代币交易经常使用机器人，因此实际上存在买入订单，立即注入 SOL 流动性并提高代币的价值。 Chen 曾一度出售 ZERO，获得 444 SOL，然后扭转这一局面并证明他没有收益。
所以我推出了一个名为“零”的测试代币，其描述是：“这将归零……不要购买”，认为人们会阅读它而不是购买它。
我没想到每个人都能看到它并购买它 - 我认为这是我需要发推文的东西...... pic.twitter.com/bH4b0PIlJH
— 陈思琪 (@blader) 2024 年 12 月 30 日
On-chain researcher ZachXBT raised objections, showing that Chen also bought another token, ChAIrity, also placing a sell order that crashed the price. After the second token launch, however, Chen has stated he is ready to make some of the losing parties whole, despite the token warnings. Others warned Chen to avoid paying those that claim ZERO caused losses, as the token had a clear warning. No payments or compensation has been offered for MIRA traders, who managed to take much more significant profits.
The ZERO token still holds $141K in liquidity, and has not actually gone to zero. Since bots and irrational buyers are always active, the asset may see ongoing activity and not be abandoned. Until then, ZERO may continue to lead to losses, or put pressure on Chen to recover the damages.
MIRA continues to slide as a charity token
The older MIRA token continues to slide, showing that mixing charity and meme token trading has a big downside. MIRA pumped again to $0.026, then erased 50% of its value to $0.013. The token has only $814K in liquidity and has survived for several days.
Chen has warned he expects the token to go to zero, as he continued selling to take profits for his cancer research charity. At the same time, early buyers blamed him for not warning about potential losses. Whales were also easily taking profit, benefitting from the charity hype.
Initially, Chen said he did not mind the profit potential of MIRA, despite causing losses for the community. Some of the early wallets achieved profits of over $480K, essentially taking away funds that some buyers thought would go to charity. While MIRA was more efficient than the GoFundMe approach, it also led to great inefficiencies as traders sold their early positions.
MIRA gets boost from Binance Alpha
Despite whale selling, and despite warnings that Chen would liquidate his entire share of MIRA, the token may continue to trade. MIRA was added as one of the daily selections of Binance Alpha, allowing for fast purchases.
MIRA has already spread to 11,944 holders, and new whales have appeared. The token also sees activity from high-volume clusters. The clusters are unrelated to Chen’s known wallet.
As of December 31, part of the donation is still in Chen’s wallet, valued at around $1.1M after the recent price slide. MIRA can only be sold in small batches, due to its low liquidity. The token still lacks market-makers, and there is no long-term strategy for continuing its charity purpose.
With MIRA and ZERO, Chen may find himself involved with an unintended crypto community, who may continue to pump the token and demand exposure.
After the introduction of MIRA, the brief charity token trend subsided. The one asset that remained more active was ChAIrity, with only $50K in liquidity. The token pumped briefly, then lost more than 90% of its value as most of the holders were selling. Even those that wanted to donate to charity were reluctant to give up their funds to whales, instead of an actual charity.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
推荐文章
