Defensor Ethereum defende investidores como Saylor no espaço ETH
A iniciativa da empresa instalou Bitcoin como fonte de valor e como melhor proteção contra a inflação, reduzindo sua aparência como ativo especulativo. Embora a Microstrategy e a Saylor tenham sido mais firmes do que a maioria, outras entidades também foram essenciais na promoção do ativo. A pergunta do defensor da ETH causou grande agitação no X. Vários usuários desistiram, discutindo longamente a razão pela qual o espaço da ETH precisa de seu próprio campeão de alto perfil. Um usuário notou que seria incrível, lembrando que a influência da pessoa realmente proporcionará uma grande ajuda ao Ethereum . Eu ainda acho que há uma oportunidade absolutamente enorme para alguém se tornar a figura semelhante a Saylor da Ethereum Defensor Ethereum defende seu caso
Apenas comprar incansavelmente ETH, não importa o preço, e depois vender ETH (e Ethereum !) indefinidamente para o grande público
Eu gostaria de ter dinheiro para fazer isso sozinho 😅
Another user claimed there could be a concentrated decentralized effort, noting that the action could see input from influencers, whales, and other users in the space. One mentioned that a centralized figure could help boost ETH’s price, using structured mechanics. The user suggested a model that will include bonding, token boosts, and borrowing mechanisms, noting that it could help accelerate the price of the token. One user talked about yield integration, noting that it could make the strategy very effective.
Meanwhile, some users brought up examples of personalities that they felt could fill the gap. A user suggested Bit Digital CEO Samir Tabar, highlighting that his company mines Bitcoin to accumulate Ethereum, a move that has helped to promote ETH as a proxy.
Others also proposed other candidates, with a user highlighting the influence that United States President-elect Donald Trump could have on the price of Ethereum. He mentioned that his pro-crypto stance could be pivotal in shaping the future of the asset.
Challenges and the wider implications for Ethereum
The initiative, however, didn’t go down well with others, with most of them highlighting the dangers of centralized influence. A user noted that Saylor’s present and growing influence might be detrimental to the asset, noting that he holds about 2% of the total Bitcoin supply. The user noted that the development could deter others from adopting the asset, noting that a central person for Ethereum could face the same criticism.
Others also talked about how hard it is to create a company that will sustain the same hunger for Ethereum as the one Microstrategy has for Bitcoin. A user said Ethereum’s 75 million token during its pre-sale creates a unique dynamic that would discourage an entity from taking up a central role. One user also said there could be conflict of interest issues, noting that large holders or validators may not want to become a centralized figure to protect their positions within the network.
In addition, other users talked about Ethereum’s ecosystem and its unique characteristics. A user talked about the state of the network without a ‘champion’ like Saylor, suggesting that someone like Bankless could fill the role. Meanwhile, another user said the decentralized nature of the network makes it hard for it to rely on a central figure like Saylor for advocacy. The conversation also trickled into the relationship between Bitcoin and Ethereum, with a user highlighting Bitcoin’s 21 million cap makes it suitable for high-scale holding.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
Artigos Recomendados
