O novo chatbot da OpenAI pode custar US$ 200 por mês. O que é e quem pagará por isso?
O cientista da computação britânico Simon Willison perguntou: “A OpenAI compartilhou algum exemplo concreto de prompts que falham no o1 regular, mas têm sucesso no o1-pro?” Pelo contrário, as falhas já foram documentadas. Sudoku é um desafio para o modo o1 pro e é impedido por uma comédia de ilusão de ótica que é facilmente aparente para qualquer ser humano. Um engenheiro de IA, Tibor Blaho, escreveu no X : “o1 e o1-pro falharam aqui, provavelmente ainda por causa das limitações de visão (o mesmo com os quebra-cabeças de Sudoku)”. Tibor Blaho também observou que tanto o1 quanto o1-pro falharam em termos de capacidades visuais. o1 e o1-pro falharam aqui, provavelmente ainda por causa das limitações de visão (o mesmo com quebra-cabeças Sudoku) https://t.co/mAVK7WxBrq pic.twitter.com/O9boSv7ZGt
o1-pro code failed to understand/read the puzzle properly.
According to OpenAI’s internal benchmarks, the standard o1 performs only marginally better than the o1 pro mode on coding and math problems.
In order to demonstrate the consistency of the o1 pro mode, OpenAI conducted a more stringent evaluation of the same benchmarks. The model was only deemed to have solved a question if it correctly identified the answer four out of four times. However, the enhancements were not substantial in these assessments.
On Thursday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman was compelled to reiterate that ChatGPT Pro is not suitable for the majority of individuals, despite his previous assertion that OpenAI was progressing toward intelligence that was “too cheap to meter.”
He said, “Most users will be very happy with the o1 in the [ChatGPT] Plus tier!”
Bob McGrew said that improved reliability may be the most important unlock for o1 pro, especially for the medical field.
Views regarding the cost
Ameet Talwalkar, an associate professor of machine learning at Carnegie Mellon and a venture partner at Amplify Partners, said “It seems like a big risk to me to raise the price tenfold,” he added, “I think we’ll have a much better sense in just a few weeks as to the appetite for this functionality.”
Guy Van den Broeck, a computer scientist at UCLA, said, “I don’t know if the price point makes sense and if pricey reasoning models will be the norm.”
Prospective consumers are not provided with a significant amount of information when the o1 pro mode is described as the most effective at resolving “the hardest problems.”
It is difficult to rationalize paying more in the absence of specific examples of the model’s purportedly enhanced capabilities, which include the ability to “think longer” and exhibit “intelligence.”
A Step-By-Step System To Launching Your Web3 Career and Landing High-Paying Crypto Jobs in 90 Days.
Artigos Recomendados
