O setor de criptografia registrou outra grande vitória depois que o Quinto Tribunal do Circuito dos EUA decidiu na terça-feira que o Tesouro exagerou ao sancionar os trac inteligentes imutáveis do Tornado Cash . O tribunal decidiu que o software autônomo não pode ser classificado como propriedade.
O painel de três juízes que supervisiona o caso decidiu em 26 de novembro que os trac inteligentes são imutáveis e, portanto, não pertencem ou são controlados como propriedade por qualquer entidade ou pessoa sob a Lei Internacional de Poderes Econômicos de Emergência (IEEPA).
Segundo os juízes, os trac inteligentes não podem ser classificados como bens sujeitos a sanções nos termos da regulamentação existente. O tribunal considerou ilegais as sanções do Tesouro contra o misturador de criptografia e que elas ultrapassaram sua autoridade defi pelo Congresso.
1/ Hoje, o Tribunal de Apelações do Quinto Circuito dos EUA decidiu no caso Tornado Cash movido por usuários do software (Van Loon v. Tesouro), concluindo que “ trac inteligentes imutáveis (linhas de código de software que permitem a privacidade) são não a 'propriedade' de um cidadão ou entidade estrangeira.” https://t.co/G0vkoYzt8O
— Associação Blockchain (@BlockchainAssn) 27 de novembro de 2024
The panel said the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) exceeded its authority in sanctioning Tornado Cash’s immutable smart contracts. It reversed a lower court’s decision granting the platform’s users a partial summary judgment.
Bill Hughes, a lawyer at Consensys, issued a detailed summary of the court’s ruling, indicating that the immutable smart contracts are nothing more than lines of code. Hughes also wrote that smart contracts are less like a “service” and more like a tool that is used in performing a service.
Hughes said the case will now proceed to the district court and emphasized that the new court judgment does not affect the crypto mixer’s blocked status.
“District court is handed back the case, with the idea that it has to decide the merits again while applying the law as the Fifth Circuit now says it applies, i.e., that the immutable contracts can’t be added to the sanctions list. It probably changes nothing else with TornadoCash being otherwise designated as blocked.”
– Bill Hughes
Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, wrote that the decision to block open source technology because of a small number of its malicious users is not what the U.S. Congress authorized.
Tornado Cash found itself in the jaws of regulators in 2022 after the U.S. Treasury sanctioned the protocol. The Treasury alleged that the protocol laundered more than $7 billion worth of digital assets between 2019 and 2022. The U.S. Treasury published a public statement saying that crypto mixers that facilitate criminal activities threaten U.S. national security.
The United States Treasury Department added more than 40 crypto wallet addresses allegedly connected to Tornado Cash to the Specially Designated Nationals list of the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC).
However, six Tornado Cash users, led by Joseph Van Loon, sued the Treasury with the support of Coinbase. The plaintiff claimed that the Treasury’s addition of 44 Tornado Cash smart contract addresses to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list was not in accordance with the law.
In October, U.S.-based crypto policy advocacy group Coin Center filed a lawsuit against OFAC for sanctioning the crypto mixer. However, a Texas federal court judge ruled in favor of the U.S. Treasury that Tornado Cash was “an entity that may be subject to OFAC regulations. The plaintiffs appealed the judge’s decision and extended the case.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap