Disappointed by the Social Security COLA? There Could Be More Bad News Coming.

Source The Motley Fool

The Social Security Administration (SSA) recently announced the upcoming cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for 2025, and many retirees feel discouraged by it.

Next year's adjustment will be 2.5%, the lowest since 2021. Once the 2025 COLA takes effect, the average retiree will collect roughly $50 more per month.

As costs still remain stubbornly high, shrinking COLAs aren't going far. In fact, a whopping 81% of retirees say that these adjuments provide little to no help with everyday expenses, according to a 2024 survey from The Motley Fool.

While there is some good news about next year's COLA, there's also some not-so-good news. Here's what you need to know.

Person with a serious expression looking out a window.

Image source: Getty Images.

The COLA continues to struggle with inflation

In theory, smaller raises should be a good thing for retirees. The COLA is directly tied to changes in inflation, so smaller adjustments suggest that inflation is slowing down. Lower costs will likely help retirees more than larger COLAs, so this should be good news.

However, Social Security has consistently struggled to keep up with rising costs. In fact, inflation has outpaced the COLA in four of the last five years. The only year in which the COLA came out ahead of the inflation rate was 2023, which saw a record-breaking 8.7% COLA -- the highest adjustment in roughly 40 years.

Part of this struggle may be due to how the COLA is calculated. The SSA uses the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), which measures changes in costs that primarily affect workers.

Some experts have pushed for the SSA to start using a different index to calculate the COLA -- specifically, the CPI-E, which is designed to track costs impacting adults age 62 and older. Using the CPI-E rather than the CPI-W could result in larger COLAs that are more tailored to retirees' financial needs.

Social Security's cash issues could cause more problems

There may be many reasons behind the SSA's reluctance to pay out higher COLAs, even as the adjustments struggle to do the job they were designed for. The system is incredibly complicated, and even small changes often require pushing through mountains of bureaucratic red tape.

That said, Social Security's consistent cash flow issues could make it even less likely that we'll see more effective COLAs going forward.

For years now, the Social Security program has been running at a deficit. The income from payroll taxes and other sources hasn't been enough to fully fund benefit payments, so the SSA has been pulling money from its trust funds to bridge the gap.

According to the SSA Board of Trustees' most recent estimates, the trust funds will likely be depleted by 2035. When that happens, the current income sources will only be enough to cover around 83% of scheduled benefits, meaning retirees could see their benefits cut by 17% in the next decade or so.

The more the SSA pays out in benefits, the faster it will burn through the trust funds -- and the sooner cuts will become a reality, assuming lawmakers don't find a solution quickly. While higher COLAs would have an immediate effect on retirees' bank accounts, they could also create bigger problems down the road.

What this means for your retirement

There may be nothing you can do about the COLA or the future of Social Security. But you can take steps to either increase your savings or at least keep realistic expectations about how far your benefits will go.

If you can either continue working or find an additional source of income, that could help stretch your savings. This strategy may not be feasible for everyone, but if Social Security isn't going to be as reliable going forward, it pays to do whatever you can to reduce your dependence on your benefits.

Reducing your spending, if you can swing it, can also help your savings last longer. If your savings are stashed in a retirement account like a 401(k) or IRA, that money will continue to grow for as long as it sits in your account. Even if you can't increase your savings, keeping more of your nest egg untouched can help your money build over time.

Millions of retirees are already struggling to make ends meet, and the disappointing COLA may not help much. But by staying updated on Social Security's future, you can take as many steps as possible to protect your savings.

The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook

If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.

View the "Social Security secrets" »

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Gold Price Analysis Today | Forex Gold Analysis | XAU/USD Analysis - November 11, 2026Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
Author  Mitrade
Nov 11, Wed
Get the latest gold price analysis, forex gold insights, and XAU/USD analysis for November 11, 2026. Read on for the details.
placeholder
Nvidia slid 7.7% after hours while AMD and Broadcom rose — the AI trade changed hands, it didn't breakNvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
Author  Irene Q.
Nov 12, Thu
Nvidia closed Wednesday at 173.73, up 2.87%, then fell as much as 8.1% to 159.44 after reports that its board was preparing for a possible leadership change. The same session, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose 5.7% with all 30 components higher, CoreWeave jumped 24.7% on 168% revenue growth, and Micron added 11.9%. If AI demand were being repriced, AMD and Broadcom would not be bid. This is a governance discount on one name, and 204.54 — the 200-day average — is the level that settles it.
placeholder
US October PPI Preview: Fed Rate Hike Expectations Rise, PPI May Be Key Variable; How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold Move?On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
Author  TradingKey
Nov 12, Thu
On Friday (Nov. 13) Eastern Time, the U.S. will release the October Producer Price Index (PPI). Following the October CPI once again exceeding expectations, the market will look to the PP
placeholder
Gold hit a one-year low while central banks bought 321 tonnes — the sellers were never the ones you thinkSpot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 02: 40
Spot gold closed at 3,876 on Thursday, down 2.8% and its lowest close in more than a year, with an intraday low near 3,852. The dollar is at a 19-month high of 103.21 and the 10-year yield is at 5.10%, so the price move is easy to explain. What is harder to explain is who sold: central banks bought 321 tonnes in Q3, the PBoC added for a 24th straight month, ETF holdings are near a record 4,256 tonnes, and roughly 95% of the futures selling came from non-reportable and sovereign-type accounts rather than hedge funds. This piece separates the two books that have to balance.
placeholder
Brent rose 3.3% and US crude stocks built 4.66 million barrels in the same weekBrent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
Author  Irene Q.
Yesterday 03: 06
Brent January settled at 95.82, up 3.3%, and WTI at 88.74, up 2.55%, after the US signalled it would not pursue a deal with Iran and attacks on Gulf shipping continued. In the same week, EIA data showed US crude inventories rising 4.657 million barrels against expectations of a 1.1 million draw, with gasoline up another 1.799 million. OPEC output also rebounded 1.96 million barrels a day to 27.16 million in October, led by Saudi Arabia at 10.56 million. This piece separates the geopolitical premium from the physical balance and lays out where each side of the trade is anchored.
goTop
quote