AI vs. analysts: The future of investment research

Source Cryptopolitan

Can artificial intelligence make human analysts irrelevant? That’s the question on everyone’s mind as AI models completely revolutionize investment research. Byron Wien, a market strategist who defined the 1990s, believes the best research comes from bold, non-consensus ideas that prove correct.

Now the pressure is on AI to meet this standard and potentially sideline analysts who have dominated the field for decades. For years, analysts have dissected financial statements and scoured headlines, all to help investors make better decisions.

AI has stepped into this space with tools that simplify, automate, and sometimes outperform traditional methods. Large language models (LLMs) have become particularly effective at analyzing financial data, doing in minutes what might take a team of analysts days.

Predicting earnings, for instance, plays right into AI’s strengths. Profit patterns tend to follow logical trends—good years lead to more good years; bad years lead to more bad ones. AI thrives in these predictable spaces, outperforming human analysts who sometimes let noise or bias cloud their judgment.

LLMs rewriting the investment analysis playbook

The University of Chicago’s work with LLMs has turned heads. Researchers used AI to predict earnings variance and found that these models beat human analysts’ median estimates. The secret? LLMs excel at understanding the story behind earnings reports, something traditional algorithms never managed to do. 

These models mimic the logical steps of senior analysts, like disciplined juniors on a financial team. AI models also sidestep one of the biggest human pitfalls: overconfidence. Analysts are notorious for adjusting their projections to fit what they think investors want to hear. AI doesn’t play that game.

By tweaking an AI model’s “temperature” settings—a fancy term for randomness—you can calculate risk and return bands with cold, hard statistics. You can even get a confidence estimate for its predictions. Humans, by comparison, tend to get cocky with their forecasts, doubling down on bad calls instead of reassessing.

Despite these wins, AI is far from perfect. It won’t find the next Nvidia or foresee another global financial meltdown. Big market shocks like these don’t follow patterns, and AI struggles when the unexpected happens.

It also can’t grill company executives during earnings calls or pick up on evasive answers about critical issues. Markets are messy and constantly shifting, and AI lacks the intuition to adapt. That’s where top analysts still shine—they know when to pivot, dig deeper, and push for answers.

But the AI hype will probably remain strong for a long time. Tech giants are obsessed. Microsoft is betting big—$80 billion big—on AI and the infrastructure it needs. For fiscal 2025, the tech giant plans to spend more than half of that in the U.S. on data centers to train and deploy AI models.

Why the splurge? AI demands insane computing power. Training models like ChatGPT means linking thousands of chips in massive data center clusters.

Advertising dollars could power the next tech boom

AI might follow the same road as past tech revolutions: fueled by advertising money. Remember how Google and Facebook rose to power? They cashed in on brand-building budgets, taking dollars from everyone—from Tide to your local plumber.

Even subscription-heavy companies like Netflix and Amazon are now leaning on ads. Alphabet, Google’s parent company, is a prime example of how far this model can go. Since its 2004 IPO, Alphabet’s revenue has surged by 160 times, hitting over $300 billion in 2023.

AI has the potential to reshape industries, just like radio, TV, and the internet did before. Back in the day, newspapers relied on ads for two-thirds of their revenue.

Radio and TV thrived on commercials, keeping them free for audiences. AI might soon be the next big advertising platform, pulling in dollars to fund groundbreaking developments.

AI can spit out ideas—some brilliant, some nonsensical. It can run endless scenarios, pulling insights from history that even an army of researchers might miss. But it can’t give you that “spark of genius.” Analysts bring something AI can’t replicate: the ability to question, adapt, and see the bigger picture in real time. 

That human touch is still invaluable in a world where non-consensus recommendations—the ones no machine would think to make—often turn out to be the most profitable. The real takeaway? AI and analysts aren’t enemies. They’re tools for each other.

A Step-By-Step System To Launching Your Web3 Career and Landing High-Paying Crypto Jobs in 90 Days.

Disclaimer: For information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
placeholder
Big Tech's $800 billion AI bill faces its first real test — free cash flow is the judgeAlphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 26, Mon
Alphabet and Microsoft report after the close on October 28, Amazon on October 29, with hyperscaler AI capex running near $800 billion a year. Meta's negative free cash flow and 9.40% drop on October 22 was the warning; this week's prints decide whether cloud growth and backlog can pay for the buildout. Here are the consensus numbers, the free-cash-flow table and the two-sided test.
placeholder
Anthropic files for a $2 trillion IPO — the $80.7 billion loss is the decoy, the $450 billion compute bill is the riskAnthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
Author  Irene Q.
Oct 27, Tue
Anthropic publicly filed its S-1 on October 26, revealing $16.29 billion of first-half revenue (+1,304% year over year) and a $80.7 billion net loss — of which $72.4 billion is a non-cash convertible-note charge. The real number is the $450 billion of signed, mostly non-cancelable compute commitments. Here is what the filing says, why NVDA, ARM and MU are the tradeable read-through, and the conditions that decide whether the AI trade passes its first public valuation test.
placeholder
Fed October Rate Decision Preview: Rate Hike Pause Has Become Consensus, How Will US Stocks, Dollar, and Gold React?The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
Author  TradingKey
Oct 27, Tue
The Federal Reserve will announce its October interest rate decision at 14:00 Eastern Time on October 28, and Fed Chair Warsh will hold a press conference at 14:30. Markets currently wide
placeholder
Bitcoin is back above $80,000 — but 75% of the bounce was shorts, not buyersBitcoin trades at $80,669, back above the $80,000 line after touching $79,145 on October 24. But 75.4% of the last 24 hours of futures liquidations were shorts, CME open interest fell 36,545 BTC in October, and spot ETFs lost $773.5 million on October 22-23. Price is up; positioning is down. Here is why the bounce is a squeeze, and the four things that would make it real.
Author  Suzie
23 hours ago
Bitcoin trades at $80,669, back above the $80,000 line after touching $79,145 on October 24. But 75.4% of the last 24 hours of futures liquidations were shorts, CME open interest fell 36,545 BTC in October, and spot ETFs lost $773.5 million on October 22-23. Price is up; positioning is down. Here is why the bounce is a squeeze, and the four things that would make it real.
placeholder
Brent's $115 front month sits $4.6 above January — the $14 spread to WTI is the supply-risk premiumDecember Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
Author  Irene Q.
23 hours ago
December Brent trades at $115.29 while January is $110.71, a $4.58 backwardation. The December Brent-WTI spread is $14.2, versus a $3-5 normal. That gap, not the headline, is where the Middle East supply risk is priced. Here is what the curve says, why the December contract's expiry on October 30 will mechanically cut the headline by $4.6, and the 108.81 neckline that decides the next move.
goTop
quote