Vitalik Buterin elogia a Starknet (STRK) por su uso más eficiente de L1
Vitalik Buterin elogió a Starknet (STRK) por resolver el problema de las elevadas tarifas de los blobs. Buterin cree que Ethereum puede aumentar la capacidad de los blobs, pero que los protocolos acumulativos también deberían optimizar sus operaciones.
Vitalik Buterin elogió a Starknet (STRK), uno de los principales protocolos acumulativos L2, por sus soluciones de blob gas más eficientes. Buterin cree que Ethereum puede aumentar la capacidad de los blobs, haciendo que su L1 sea aún más barato para todos los L2. Sin embargo, también cree que las redes deberían cuidar de lograr un uso más eficiente de los blobs.
Una parte del escalamiento L2 es que Ethereum aumenta su capacidad de blobs. La otra parte es que los paquetes acumulativos se vuelven más eficientes en cuanto a datos. Es bueno ver a @Starknet a la altura del desafío.
Me encantaría ver más paquetes acumulativos de EVM que también aumenten la eficiencia de los datos (consulte https://t.co/HZijLDNqog ) https://t.co/0MTasPyPEg
- vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) 18 de noviembre de 2024
Buterin’s statement arrives at a time when there are more blocks with blob sections filled to their full capacity. The creation of a blob economy will make the task of L2 more complex, as they have to decide between state finality and paying more to Ethereum.
Starknet pays only $970 in rent to Ethereum in 24 hours, compared to $18.41K for Base. For Base, fees to L1 rose more than 9 times in the past month.
Starknet is not the best example for a blob-based economy. The chain is relatively small and has lost most of its activity after running its airdrop. On slow days, Starknet has around 10K active addresses, with under $5K in revenues. For Buterin, the technical approach is what matters, and other chains also joined to claim they could achieve lower blob fees through data optimization.
Until recently, even Base and Arbitrum paid extremely low rents to Ethereum. The leader is once again Taiko, which pays upward of $60K in daily rent for blobs. Taiko is also the only L2 that does not delay its blob posting schedule, to achieve speed and finality.
For a few months since the March Dencun upgrade, L2 used Ethereum practically for free, or for a very low rent. After blobs started filling up, L2 now has to pay more, potentially cutting into their fee bottom line. L2 managed to retain big parts of their fees for themselves, retaining them from Ethereum.
For Buterin, this situation seems to be preferable, leading other L2 to invent ways to pay low fees to the main network. At the same time, critics of Ethereum still believe the main chain should try to scale similarly to Solana, while also retaining L2.
The big problem seems to be the stagnant Ethereum price, which is still under $3,200, despite the all-time high for Bitcoin (BTC). ETH is still slightly inflationary, with more than 500K new tokens produced on a yearly basis. New ETH is distributed daily to validators and stakers, including block rewards. Fee burns are not enough to keep the supply of ETH low. The coin has also not seen anything close to a supply crunch, with enough ETH available from old whales.
Blobs accelerate in the past month
In the past 30 days, periods with competitive blob pricing arrived almost daily. L2 could no longer reduce their posting enough to prevent a price rally.
Currently, most of the blob traffic comes from a handful of top L2. However, there are more than 100 chains with the potential to grow their usage and require representation on Ethereum blocks.
Expensive blobs were one of the potential developments which could make Ethereum valuable again. The reason for this is that L2 chains carry multiple fee-generating apps, but do not share that value with Ethereum.
However, this metric is not entirely true. In the past month, even the emerging competitive market for blobs diverted up to $2M from all L2 into Ethereum. The question is whether Ethereum should increase the number of blobs and the blob limit, to avoid making L2 too expensive for end users.
In 2024, Ethereum is slowly losing its lead as a fee producer. During some periods, Ethereum is no longer the biggest generator of fees. In the past day, even Solana once again surpassed Ethereum’s larger and more liquid network.
Beyond the technology, Ethereum’s biggest use case is the USDT stablecoin, which is one of its main sources of traffic and transaction fees. On Ethereum, despite L2 scalability, liquidity remains fragmented, leaving L2 to compete for inflows of USDT.
Land a High-Paying Web3 Job in 90 Days: The Ultimate Roadmap
Artículos Recomendados
